Developers
What your team owns, what mode40 owns, and the choices worth settling before an implementation starts.
A platform decision made without them is a decision made without a schedule. Connecting a site walks the path all four sit on.
Where the readiness gate finds gaps, implementation runs a data-backbone phase. Part of that phase asks the customer to define, in writing, governance decisions about your operation rather than settings in the platform:
They are the items most often deferred, because none of them is urgent until the day it blocks something. Retention and purge in particular tend to surface late, and they are policy questions that usually need someone outside the project to answer.
Firewall and VLAN posture decides where the MQTT client can run and what it can reach. Topic access rules decide what it is permitted to publish.
Between a business system such as an ERP and the platform there is usually a bridge to build. You choose who builds it.
Build it yourself. Your team owns the bridge and the knowledge stays in-house, and your team carries the maintenance when the source system changes.
Buy it from mode40. It is available as a custom development service, at additional cost. It is not part of the platform licence, and it is scoped and priced separately.
Make this choice early. It moves both cost and schedule, and it is the most common late surprise in an implementation because it is easy to assume a platform purchase includes it. Integration implementation is where that scoping happens.
Credentials are issued during onboarding, which means provisioning goes through mode40 rather than through a self-service screen. The agreement commits to standard software updates without attaching a published cadence to them. Security and governance states both, along with what else is undefined today.
An implementation is a sequence with real go/no-go points in it, and knowing where they fall makes the responsibilities above easier to schedule.
Both gates are worth planning around. The readiness gate decides whether a site is ready to start. The integration-validation gate decides whether the data going into a module is good enough to configure on top of.
The longest item in an implementation is connectivity, and the work is physical rather than software. This is the part that is consistently underestimated.
None of those is fixed by the platform. Each one needs site time, site access, and frequently a change window on equipment that is running production. A plan that assumes every machine in scope can report on day one is a plan that will move.
The questions below decide fit, and they are cheaper to answer before a signature than in month three.
Site readiness covers how the readiness gate scores a site.
We use cookies to understand how the site is used and to connect form submissions to earlier visits. No analytics or marketing cookies are set until you choose. Privacy Policy